Auros ([info]auros) wrote,
@ 2008-03-30 15:19:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: pleased

Convention highlight...
I amended one word of the CA Democratic Platform -- changed support for net zero energy buildings to net zero emissions (because the former is simply not feasible on all sites, and the latter emphasizes the real goal of addressing climate change and allows for investment in off-site renewables and various kinds of carbon offset to count).

ETA: Another highlight moment was on Sunday morning, when, slightly sleep deprived, I was approached by a guy who's making a documentary about the difference between conservative and progressive/liberal values. After rambling a bit, I came up with a line that I think was pretty good. I'd basically been saying that I really believe the rank-and-file conservative is a well-meaning person; I know the woman who I used to work with at the polls in College Terrace was extremely nice, the sort of person you'd trust to house-sit, or you'd tell the kids to go find if they get locked out of the house and you're not home... These folks like the way things are, or were when they grew up, or have a generally idyllic vision of a lost past -- maybe it's their parents' generation. In any case, they don't like to be pushed out of their comfort zone by anything new and different, and that includes people who don't seem to be like them. Whereas for progressives, other-ness isn't a problem; we're all us, we're just different kinds of us. We annoy everyone with our calls for recycling, because we see that you can't throw stuff away -- there's no such place (unless we're talking about lobbing things into the nearest star), the whole world is here. Anyways, I was riffing on this general topic when I got to a really good encapsulation: Conservatives see that the world is full of dragons, and call out for kings to protect them and walls they can hide behind; progressives say, "Hey, flying reptiles. Coooool! You think they'd come play with us?"



(Post a new comment)


[info]gramina
2008-03-30 10:51 pm UTC (link)
Congratulations!

(Reply to this)


[info]entomologist
2008-03-31 12:13 am UTC (link)
Very good! That's the kind of edit that makes a real, substantial difference in meaning. Sounds like you made the platform as a whole measurably smarter.

(Reply to this)


[info]mickle
2008-03-31 03:25 pm UTC (link)
I think your framing of conservative vs. liberal values is probably right. It reminds me a little of the Lakoff framework (conservative strict father vs. liberal nuturing mother), but I prefer yours because the gender-image-coding tires me out (even though I think it is used, why build frames around it?) and because I think it better explains the young-techie-conservative thing prevalent in the Bay Area. (Those guys are indebted at least to anarchic imagery and therefore don't work with 50s Dad so well, I don't think.)

(Reply to this)


[info]dragondawn420
2008-04-02 04:57 am UTC (link)
Heh. Dragons. :)

(Reply to this)


[info]a_steep_hill
2008-05-13 02:13 am UTC (link)
Hi!

[info]xthread told me that I should check out your journal. Looks like we do have some interests in common, around sustainability, green building, etc. I hope you don't mind if I add you to my friendslist.

I agree with your point that the real goal is net-zero emissions, not zero energy. But I am curious how you would address the problem of carbon credits in that context. I've read a lot of different ideas on carbon trading systems, and the problems of additionality and real accountability around carbon credits seem nearly intractable. It's easy to measure the emission of carbon, but it's very hard to measure nega-tons of carbon in a way that doesn't leave huge opportunities for abuse.

As a green building engineer, my benchmark for the ideal is to eliminate the use of imported power for HVAC and daytime lighting, because these are the things we can get from ambient solar energy and good design. I can't design the building to power the occupants computers, except by putting PV on the roof. But I should be able to make the building largely self-sufficient in terms of climate control, at least in most California climates.

I love the dragon analogy, by the way.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]auros
2008-05-13 02:22 am UTC (link)
Sure, nobody needs my permission to add me as a friend. (If somebody I didn't like friended me, I just wouldn't friend them back, and they'd still see exactly the same stuff out of my journal as if they hadn't friended me. *shrug*)

I agree that the accounting issues around carbon credits are hard, but I think we're going to have to come up with some kind of workable system, since cap-and-trade is the only carbon regulation that's going to be passable in the US any time soon. Both the Chicago Climate Exchange, and the Kyoto-created entities, have at least been working to identify where the problems are.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…