Auros ([info]auros) wrote,
@ 2009-02-26 13:33:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: impressed

Department of, "I wish I'd thought of that."
One of the ideas floating around for how to displace our need for oil with a renewable replacement is oil-rich algaes. You take some unused land -- maybe vacant lots that are already messed up from past industrial use -- and set up ponds, and set your little biological friends loose turning CO2 and sunlight into useful hydrocarbons. When you burn the fuel, you're just returning the same CO2 to the atmosphere -- there's no net increase. (And in fact, if you take the non-oil mass and find uses that keep carbon out of the atmosphere on a long-term basis, you may be producing a net reduction in GHGs.)

One of the big problems with this technology is that there's a tradeoff between how densely you let the algae grow before you harvest it, and how deep you can make your pond. If it gets too dense, it blocks out sunlight, preventing layers below from growing. So there's a pretty firm cap on how much can be grown per unit area.

Enter Bionavitas Inc. The founders of Bionavitas asked what is, in retrospect, a kind of obvious question. Does light really have to filter down through the water from the surface? They basically set up tubes* that pipe sunlight in, kind of like these popular tubular skylights. As a result, they can now grow algae in meter-deep ponds, while achieving the kind of density you normally only get in the top few inches.

This is seriously one of those, "Well, duh!" ideas. And I hope they get very, very rich off of it, since that would mean a lot of nice algae-based biodiesel coming onto the market. (Incidentally, a Presidio team that graduated last semester has been working on an algae plan involving using algaculture to remediate land damaged by mining. They say they'll be able to restore land to a state where once they drain their ponds, you can let regular ecosystem succession take place -- meadow, to scrub, to forest -- and during the process, they produce a salable product. Not bad, if they can really pull it off.)

* Their algae farming technology is a series of tubes. It's not a dump truck.



(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]enochsmiles
2009-02-26 10:00 pm UTC (link)
Brilliant.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jrtom
2009-02-26 10:36 pm UTC (link)
heh. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]plymouth
2009-02-26 10:02 pm UTC (link)
* Their algae farming technology is a series of tubes. It's not a dump truck.

Ok, I totally LOLed at that. Will I never tire of that joke?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]auros
2009-02-26 10:26 pm UTC (link)
Ted Stevens: Best Insane Criminal Senator EVAR.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]erg
2009-02-26 10:10 pm UTC (link)
I wonder how they keep he algae from growing onto the lights, blocking it from the rest. Personally, I think they should use silo's, and a some method to create spin. I'd say churn, but I don't know what breaking up the algae would do.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]auros
2009-02-26 10:24 pm UTC (link)
They don't. The point is that the algae can only grow within a few inches of a light source. So they use the pipes to make a network of lights sources, such that no part of the water is more than a few inches from a pipe.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]erg
2009-02-26 10:44 pm UTC (link)
I'm envisoning the next generation to look like christmas lights, so it looks like glowing pixies are doing all the work.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]a_steep_hill
2009-02-26 10:12 pm UTC (link)
One of the biggest problems with algae as a fuel source appears to be the tradeoff between capital costs and contamination control: if you're growing a strain optimized for oil production, you can grow them in a close bioreactor, which keeps them free of competition but is very expensive to build, or you can grow them in open ponds which are much cheaper to build and operate but ensure that your population will be contaminated by free-living algae. And your bred or engineered high-oil algae will always be at a disadvantage vs. free-living types, because making oil incurs a big metabolic cost which does not translate into a survival advantage for the algae.

Note that this issue, kind of like the problems with ethanol (whether from corn or cellulose), is not one of a fundamental physical or technological barrier, but a scaling problem. The technology can almost certainly be made to work, but scaling it up to useful production (in the context of our 20 million barrels per day oil habit) is a problem.

Two articles you might want to read:
http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/2007/05/algal-biodiesel-fact-or-fiction.html
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2531

My solution to this dilemma is this: go with open ponds, and don't worry about contamination. Don't try to grow a high-oil strain, just go for as much biomass as possible as quickly as possible. Then harvest the algae, press it dry, and feed it into a gasifier. Pyrolyze it in an oxygen poor environment, and harvest the resulting syngas (mostly H2 and CO) which can then be used to synthesize replacements for gasoline, diesel, or any number of chemicals currently made from petroleum. The problem is that the chemical yield is pretty low (as I understand it) but you will also have quite a bit of excess heat which could be used to produce power.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]auros
2009-02-26 10:30 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I'm aware of some of what you're talking about... As I mentioned, my understanding of the Presidio team's approach is using some hardier strains that produce less oil, with the specific intent of having some mining-waste contaminants leech into the water and get captured in the non-oil mass of the algae, so it's then out of the soil and can be disposed of somehow or other... I don't know all the details -- they aren't giving away everything about their business plan -- but I think they're in talks to get funding to try out their technique on an actual piece of mined-out land.

Edited at 2009-02-26 10:38 pm UTC

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jrtom
2009-02-26 10:36 pm UTC (link)
I've now got "[Aquarius/]Let The Sunshine In" running through my head.

Suggestion for further refinement: dump some sharks with frikkin' flashlights on their heads in the pond. :)

(Reply to this)


(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…