| Auros ( |
Yeah, I'm not necessarily averse to the concept of a rainy day fund in general. I'm just not crazy about the way the GOP is trying to set it up as a de-facto spending cap. It doesn't quite limit spending to current programs * (1 + inflation) * (1 + population growth), which is what Colorado did, and is now trying to reverse. But it's still problematic.
BTW, your sarcasm tags got interpreted as HTML and disappeared. I saw them in the emailed version, but they're not up on the web... Next time try ampersanded entities. <like this> :-)
Re: infrastructure, I kinda like the concept of a state or federal infrastructure bank, which would do for fiscal policy what the fed does for monetary policy. Governments would be able to put infrastructure projects up on a list, and the bank would have the authority to accelerate or decelerate grants of financing, in order to keep gov't spending countercyclical.
BTW, your sarcasm tags got interpreted as HTML and disappeared. I saw them in the emailed version, but they're not up on the web... Next time try ampersanded entities. <like this> :-)
Re: infrastructure, I kinda like the concept of a state or federal infrastructure bank, which would do for fiscal policy what the fed does for monetary policy. Governments would be able to put infrastructure projects up on a list, and the bank would have the authority to accelerate or decelerate grants of financing, in order to keep gov't spending countercyclical.