?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Welcome to the Aurosphere
Thursday, June 28th, 2007

Date:2007-06-28 09:48
Subject:Mitt Romney thinks cruelty to animals is "emotion-free crisis management".
Security:Public
Mood: nauseated

cut because it discusses a presidential candidate proudly describing what an inhumane dog owner he isCollapse )

I would like to believe that Mr. Romney is simply a liar; that he made up a colorful story. Even if so, he should apologize for this disgusting story. And either way, he is not fit to stand for election to the highest office in the land. No wonder he wants to "double Guantanamo", as he said in one of the GOP debates (not that the various other old white men on that stage were being much more humane; with the exceptions of Ron Paul and John McCain, everyone there was racing to see who could most strongly endorse torture "enhanced interrogation techniques"). It's common for sociopaths to start out with animal cruelty, before moving on to human beings. A man who can so thoughtlessly subject his own dog to hours of torture might well see nothing wrong with treating people (guilty or not) in a similar fashion.

34 comments | post a comment



Date:2007-06-28 10:15
Subject:On a less depressing topic...
Security:Public
Mood: hopeful

It's the end of the fundraising quarter. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are probably going to have raised over $20M in thirteen weeks, again. Meanwhile, the candidate who has the most specific proposals, and the most heartfelt message, is being relentlessly attacked by the right-wing noise machine. What gets them into a tizzy is not really that his advocacy for the disadvantaged, while not giving up all worldly possessions like Saint Francis of Asisi, is "hypocritical". It's that they're terrified he might actually mean it; that, like FDR (who was born to wealth, but did more to help the impoverished than anyone else in a generation), John Edwards is "a traitor to his class", a wealthy man who intends to level the playing field, making things a little fairer for people who, like him, were not born to wealth. The right wants Edwards out of the race now, so they don't have to worry about him later.

Edwards, despite having made a terrible error in supporting the war to begin with, has been clearer about getting out than the other two candidates. Obama folded on the timeline/funding issue far too quickly, when Edwards was taking out full-page ads encouraging the Dems to stand firm. (And from what I hear, it's Ellen Tauscher -- the conservative Dem who represents eviladmin's district -- who is behind the next effort to put some leverage on Bush, by demanding that he at least pay for these "unforseeable" supplemental costs, by repealing some of his tax cuts. Where's Obama?) Edwards is also the only candidate on either side with a serious universal healthcare program. (Obama's program, while interesting, is not universal. And Hillary, despite having had fourteen years to think about what she'd do differently if offered another shot at fixing the healthcare system, has not offered a plan at all, and only vaguely promises that she'd get universal care by the end of eight years in office.)

I think Edwards has an excellent shot at the nomination; he consistently polls in the lead in Iowa -- not that you'd know it from the media coverage -- and he won South Carolina last time, and easily could do so again. (Both Hillary and Obama are counting on the African-American vote in SC; if they both scramble for that portion of the vote, and split it, Edwards could clean up.) That leaves him needing to win either NH (tough, though not impossible) or NV (not so tough, since the Las Vegas unions like him a lot, and Richardson may pull most of the Hipanic vote away from Hillary and Obama) to have wins in three-of-four early states, and huge momentum for this election's Super-Tuesday-on-Steroids (CA, NY, etc).

But he does need to stay in the race, which means hitting his (relatively modest) fundraising targets, to ensure that the mainstream media doesn't say, "We don't think you're a serious candidate anymore, so we're not going to fund reporters to follow you around." Which of course is a self-fulfilling prophecy -- take away the "media oxygen", and the public will basically forget about a candidate. It's a crummy system, but it's what we've got. So I hope you'll consider chipping in -- even five bucks helps -- to keep John Edwards in the race.

13 comments | post a comment


browse days
my journal