January 31st, 2008



After some further research, I've come down leaning strongly to No on 92. PeteRates.com gives a pretty nasty review to that proposition, and as far as I can tell he's correct about the structure of the funding mechanism. He also has an excellent rundown on why we should oppose 94-97 (which I was already planning to do). I've written extensively before about my support of 93. (91 is orphaned -- the people who submitted it decided they didn't want it to pass after all.)
  • Current Mood
    busy busy